|
Leadership
Yvonne
Harvey, Contributor
The
success of management is very much
dependent on the ability to lead.
Good day to you all. Our lesson today
will focus on leadership styles and
their impact. At the end of the lesson,
you should be able to outline the
essential characteristics of a good
leader and differentiate among the
various leadership styles.
The
leader may be described as an individual
who selects certain strategies which
are aimed at getting the work done,
so that the goals of the organisation
may be met. Leadership is referred
to as the motivating of people towards
the goals of an organisation. It is
carried out in various ways.
The
way in which a person leads is known
as his/her leadership style. Different
types of leaders practise different
styles. Some leaders use a combination
of styles. However, before looking
at the various styles of leadership,
we will consider some of the qualities
of a good leader. Traditionally, it
was believed that a good leader should
possess certain characteristics or
traits. Some of these are listed below:
| intelligence |
confidence
|
| good
judgement |
understanding |
| initiative
|
aggressiveness |
| dependability
|
flexibility |
| honesty
|
foresight
|
| courage
|
|
I
am sure you can think of other desirable
qualities. As you think of them, add
them to the list above. Keep in mind,
however, that no one person will possess
all the qualities, but a good leader
will exhibit most of them.
There
are four known and accepted styles
of leadership. Let us look at each
of them in terms of description and
the effects of each type:
1.
The autocratic/authoritarian style
The
persons who use this style are strict
leaders who, as the sole decision-makers,
have full control in the decision-making
process. Thus, those who will be affected
by a decision are not involved in
the decision-making and their opinions
are not taken into consideration.
Such
a leader sees himself as an expert,
an authority on all matters, and expects
persons to carry out the required
tasks.
Subordinates
usually do as these leaders say because
of fear that they will be punished
in some way. Examples of punishment
vary from demotion to suspension or
dismissal.
Effects
a)
Work is most often completed, just
as the leader specified.
b)
Employee input, initiative and innovation
are stifled, therefore, bad interpersonal
relationships develop.
c)
Employees are not motivated to do
their jobs well. This may ultimately
result in rapid turnover in the organisation.
2.
The laissez-faire/free reign style
Laissez-faire
is French for 'let them do it'. Workers
are made aware of what they have to
do, but the leader stands back and
allows them to plan their work and
take their own decisions, as far as
possible. Managers give little or
no direction to workers.
Thus,
there is minimum supervision and workers
are expected to use their own initiative
in achieving certain objectives.
This
style is normally practised in creative
productions and services, such as
the graphic departments of advertising
agencies.
Effects
a)
Production benefits from a variety
of ideas.
b)
Employers often become lazy and inefficient
if left too much on their own.
3.
The democratic/participative style
Workers
prefer this style as it strikes the
middle ground. The leader does not
dominate and those most likely to
be affected by a decision are consulted
before the decision is made. Note
that the leader reserves the right
not to accept a majority vote. This
leader ensures that everybody receives
fair treatment.
Effects
a)
Workers become interested and are
encouraged to take part in decisions.
b)
Workers are comfortable in their working
environment because of the interchange
of ideas and variety of opinions,
therefore, efficiency of results.
c)
It tends to slow down the decision-making
process and is thus seen as inefficient
in this respect.
4.
The charismatic style
This
leader is one who is able to lead
simply by reason of his/her outstanding
skills, personality or character.
Such a leader is said to lead from
the front by inspiring others through
skill, personality or character.
Effects
a)
Efficiency can be achieved.
b)
Pleasant personalities or characters
may 'mask' inefficiency.
What
is the best style? Who is the best
leader?
There
is no one style that can be worked
in all situations. Our conclusion,
therefore, is that the best leader
is one who is flexible, one who can
adapt to changing circumstances, that
is, to change the styles as the circumstances
dictate. In emergencies, the autocratic
method is most effective. Where a
high degree of expertise is needed,
the free reign style might be best.
It is generally assumed, however,
that the democratic style is best
to yield long-term efficiency and
productivity. Whatever the style,
under a good leader, people will work
willingly and well and ultimately,
profits will rise.
Now
for your homework:
a)
i) Who is a leader?
ii)
Define the term 'leadership style'.
b)
i) State four qualities that a good
leader should possess.
ii)
Give three positive effects of good
leadership.
c)
Distinguish between democratic and
authoritarian leadership.
d)
List one advantage of each style mentioned
in (c) above.
e)
Name and describe one other leadership
style besides the ones mentioned in
(c) above.
Yvonne
Harvey teaches at Glenmuir High School.
|